Skip to content

Commit 20c20af

Browse files
committed
doc: add minutes for meeting 2023-03-09
Closes: nodejs#830
1 parent 54e615d commit 20c20af

File tree

1 file changed

+73
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+73
-0
lines changed

doc/meetings/2023-03-09.md

Lines changed: 73 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
1+
# Node.js Release WorkGroup Meeting 2023-03-09
2+
3+
## Links
4+
5+
* **Recording**: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQUApH01jRA&t=1633s
6+
* **GitHub Issue**: https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/830
7+
* **Minutes Google Doc**: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1htIwyXRwT61t89_z9SJTwaOOdE6yzCEAf0r5UqFKVKA
8+
9+
## Present
10+
11+
* Beth Griggs (@BethGriggs)
12+
* Danielle Adams (@danielleadams)
13+
* Juan Jose (@juanarbol)
14+
* Michael Zasso (@targos)
15+
* Rafael Gonzaga (@RafaelGSS)
16+
* Richard Lau (@richardlau)
17+
18+
## Agenda
19+
20+
## Announcements
21+
22+
* nodejs/nodejs.org rewrite in Next.js has landed.
23+
* The release post generation script now relies on the native fetch API so will need to be run on versions where it is available (Node.js 18+ by default).
24+
* Node.js 18.15.0 released by Juan this week.
25+
26+
### Release Schedules
27+
* Release plan - v19.x Current [#793](https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/793)
28+
* Michael volunteered for the April release.
29+
* Release plan - v18.x Active LTS [#737](https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/737)
30+
* Danielle volunteered for the next release.
31+
* Release plan - v16.x Maintenance [#658](https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/658)
32+
* Beth volunteered to put a draft proposal together with a TBD date until we get enough content.
33+
* Potential test runner PRs that we should review.
34+
* Release plan - v14.x Maintenance LTS [#567](https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/567)
35+
* We should plan for one more release to happen before EOL and consider what would be good to land (root certificate updates, or similar.)
36+
37+
38+
### nodejs/Release
39+
40+
* Confusion around semver-minor commits [#820](https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/820)
41+
* Discussed at the last meeting.
42+
* PR opened to clarify the existing approach [nodejs/node#46592](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/46592)
43+
* (Action) Beth to add a comment and close.
44+
* Plans for npm 9 [#778](https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/778)
45+
* Desire to discuss aligning release dates in future.
46+
* Removing from the agenda.
47+
48+
49+
### nodejs/release-keys
50+
51+
* v18 and v19 are signed by a public key not captured in this keyring [#21](https://github.com/nodejs/release-keys/issues/21)
52+
* Keyring wasn’t updated, but should now be with Juan’s latest PR.
53+
* (Action) Beth to check which keys are in the keyring and also [nodejs/release-keys#23](https://github.com/nodejs/release-keys/issues/23).
54+
55+
## Q&A, Other
56+
57+
* node-core-utils
58+
* Link to Rafael’s security prepare PR [nodejs/node-core-utils#665](https://github.com/nodejs/node-core-utils/pull/665)
59+
* Agreed to stick to a two-step approach initially until `git node land --security` functionality is added.
60+
* Richard tested for the last set of security releases and noted a small issue regarding changelog links (potentially unrelated to the PR).
61+
* (Richard) Suggestion to add an option to run individual steps such as regenerating the changelog.
62+
* Rafael volunteered to be assigned to this.
63+
* FYI of the PR for deprecation numbers [nodejs/node-core-utils#685](https://github.com/nodejs/node-core-utils/pull/685)
64+
65+
* Node.js 20
66+
* Rafael is planning the proposal for early April.
67+
* Platforms support
68+
* (Action) Create an issue capturing platforms.
69+
* Reviewing toolchain requirements (gcc 10, C++ 20, etc.)
70+
71+
* Proposal: notable-changes bot comment for summaries [#821](https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/821)
72+
* TSC label bot also suggested.
73+
* Beth to take a look at implementing both as it will involve similar logic.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)