Skip to content

Conversation

DhairyaLGandhi
Copy link
Member

@DhairyaLGandhi DhairyaLGandhi commented Sep 11, 2025

Checklist

  • Appropriate tests were added
  • Any code changes were done in a way that does not break public API
  • All documentation related to code changes were updated
  • The new code follows the
    contributor guidelines, in particular the SciML Style Guide and
    COLPRAC.
  • Any new documentation only uses public API

Additional context

closes #3921

cc @AayushSabharwal @SebastianM-C @ChrisRackauckas

Add any other context about the problem here.

Copy link
Contributor

@SebastianM-C SebastianM-C left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This fixes my MWE, thanks!
That could be added as a test to ensure this does not regress.

Copy link
Member

@AayushSabharwal AayushSabharwal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually wait, this needs a test.

@DhairyaLGandhi
Copy link
Member Author

Added the test

@AayushSabharwal
Copy link
Member

https://github.com/SciML/ModelingToolkit.jl/actions/runs/17833787809/job/50705498058?pr=3922#step:6:997 seems like IDA failing initialization (because it runs overrideinit now). If it's easy, could you patch that? InterfaceI being red is really not great.

@DhairyaLGandhi
Copy link
Member Author

Agreed re failing CI, but that might be out of scope a bit.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

subset_tunables seems to modify the system in-place
3 participants