-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 695
Consolidating info on the type system and its semantics #747
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
What do you have in mind exactly? AstSemantics seems to hold everything, but is indeed spread out in that document. Or are there things outside that you'd consolidate? |
Consolidating the type information in AstSemantics would be helpful but also (possibly briefly) mentioning the type requirements of things like indirect calls and module definitions in that section could help as well. |
Going to give a stab at this once 0xc lands. |
Ok I lied... After reading through what's on the plate in #813, I'm going to wait a little longer before giving this a try. |
The type system is now fully described in the text spec. |
Yep, this is from a |
Information on the type system is scattered across each of the documents, would it be a good idea to put it all in one section/file?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: