-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Upgrade to GHC 9.2.5 #12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
I don't think we ever tried using a beefier actions machine to compile hls from source. I couldn't because it requires you to activate it on the account level. I'm fine using 9.2.4 for now which |
Oh yeah good point, that PR was using the GitHub Actions builders. Maybe things would work on the AWS CodeBuild ones. |
Well I meant we could use the more powerful github actions builders without having to change things over to CodeBuild. I'm not opposed to moving to CodeBuild I don't think, but IIRC it's a settings change in the github admin panel for smurf and a one-line change in |
This repo already uses CodeBuild: #10 |
Oh... right... and the compile of HLS would happen here in this repo. |
https://discourse.haskell.org/t/ghc-9-2-5-released/5275
We'll either have to wait for HLS to release new binaries, or produce an image without HLS. (Compiling from source didn't work for us: #8.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: