Skip to content

It would be nice to have the option of generating js rather then coffee #46

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
theinterned opened this issue Sep 24, 2011 · 8 comments
Closed
Labels

Comments

@theinterned
Copy link

This is a great gem; we are not using coffee script though so the generators don't quite fit our needs. Would you be into providing a switch to generate vanilla js rather than coffee?

It seems like the format could be specified as a command line argument and/or configuration setting?

@byee01
Copy link

byee01 commented Oct 6, 2011

I think this is an awesome idea for those that can't use coffeescript. I'd love to use backbone-rails but the necessity of coffeescript is putting me off.

@scottillogical
Copy link

+1 I'm new to backbone and coffeescript so I'd like to start out with just javascript and move to coffeescript later so this would be useful.

@dukedorje
Copy link

If you use javascript -- and especially if you know Ruby -- you owe it to yourself to look at Coffeescript.

@sgreenfield
Copy link

@dukejones Many of us have looked closely at Coffeescript and still prefer JS. I view Coffeescript as a pointless abstraction with no real added benefit. There is a lot of debate around Coffescript being included by default with rails 3.1, and I am not trying to reignite that debate, but many people share my opinion, and it would be nice to have the option to generate vanilla JS with this great gem.

@frank06
Copy link

frank06 commented Nov 18, 2011

I second @sgreenfield; it would be great to have the option to generate vanilla Javascript

@codebrew
Copy link
Owner

I'm all for this with having coffeescript as the default and an option to generate js instead. Anyone want to work on a pull request?

@jgv
Copy link

jgv commented Jan 30, 2012

I have a pure js fork that I've been using although it's not battle tested. I could create a fork that defaults to coffeescript but allows for a js option unless someone has already tackled this.

@theinterned
Copy link
Author

Closing this 10 year old issue!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants