We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I really like what you did in https://github.com/nRF24/.github/tree/main/.github/workflows to use reusable workflows
I would also like to try to move some common workflows to .github repo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Download all artifacts uses: actions/download-artifact@v4 with: path: ci-artifacts pattern: coverage-data-* - run: mv ci-artifacts/**/.coverage* ./ - name: Setup python uses: actions/setup-python@v5 with: python-version: '3.x' - name: Create coverage report run: | pip3 install coverage[toml] coverage combine coverage html - name: Upload comprehensive coverage HTML report uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 with: name: coverage-report path: htmlcov/ - run: coverage report && coverage xml - uses: codecov/codecov-action@v4 env: CODECOV_TOKEN: ${{secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN}} with: files: ./coverage.xml fail_ci_if_error: true # optional (default = false) verbose: true # optional (default = false)
Unfortunately, I don't think unit testing would fit well into a reusable workflow. Testing usually involves some software-specific setup in CI.
Sorry, something went wrong.
shenxianpeng
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
I really like what you did in https://github.com/nRF24/.github/tree/main/.github/workflows to use reusable workflows
I would also like to try to move some common workflows to .github repo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: