Skip to content

Use ";" instead of "{}" for empty constructor bodies #22004

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
munificent opened this issue Jan 6, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

Use ";" instead of "{}" for empty constructor bodies #22004

munificent opened this issue Jan 6, 2015 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
closed-invalid Closed as we don't believe the reported issue is generally actionable devexp-linter Issues with the analyzer's support for the linter package legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug

Comments

@munificent
Copy link
Member

Moved from: dart-lang/dart_style#117

Instead of:

class Point {
  int x, y;
  Point(this.x, this.y) {}
}

prefer:

class Point {
  int x, y;
  Point(this.x, this.y);
}

@pq
Copy link
Member

pq commented Feb 4, 2015

Migrated (back) to github: https://github.com/dart-lang/dart_lint/issues/4


Added Invalid label.

@munificent munificent added Type-Enhancement legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. devexp-linter Issues with the analyzer's support for the linter package closed-invalid Closed as we don't believe the reported issue is generally actionable labels Feb 4, 2015
@kevmoo kevmoo added type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug and removed type-enhancement labels Mar 1, 2016
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
closed-invalid Closed as we don't believe the reported issue is generally actionable devexp-linter Issues with the analyzer's support for the linter package legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants