Skip to content

comment_references BAD example has no comment #58080

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
srawlins opened this issue Dec 8, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by dart-archive/linter#1884
Closed

comment_references BAD example has no comment #58080

srawlins opened this issue Dec 8, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by dart-archive/linter#1884
Labels
devexp-linter Issues with the analyzer's support for the linter package legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. type-bug Incorrect behavior (everything from a crash to more subtle misbehavior) type-documentation A request to add or improve documentation

Comments

@srawlins
Copy link
Member

srawlins commented Dec 8, 2019

The BAD example of comment_references doesn't have... a comment:

http://dart-lang.github.io/linter/lints/comment_references.html

@pq
Copy link
Member

pq commented Dec 8, 2019

Oh my 😬.

Good catch!

@pq pq added type-bug Incorrect behavior (everything from a crash to more subtle misbehavior) type-documentation A request to add or improve documentation labels Dec 8, 2019
@devoncarew devoncarew added devexp-linter Issues with the analyzer's support for the linter package legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. labels Nov 18, 2024
@devoncarew devoncarew transferred this issue from dart-archive/linter Nov 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
devexp-linter Issues with the analyzer's support for the linter package legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. type-bug Incorrect behavior (everything from a crash to more subtle misbehavior) type-documentation A request to add or improve documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants