Skip to content

Fail for install dotnet-sdk-2.2 on Linux Mint 19.1 #2885

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
gilsao opened this issue Jun 16, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Fail for install dotnet-sdk-2.2 on Linux Mint 19.1 #2885

gilsao opened this issue Jun 16, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@gilsao
Copy link

gilsao commented Jun 16, 2019

Problem encountered on https://dotnet.microsoft.com/download/linux-package-manager/ubuntu19-04/sdk-current
Operating System: Linux Ubuntu 19.04 - x64

Provide details about the problem you are experiencing. Include your operating system version, exact error message, code sample, and anything else that is relevant.

Problem below:

sudo apt-get install dotnet-sdk-2.2
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
dotnet-sdk-2.2 : Depends: aspnetcore-runtime-2.2 (>= 2.2.5) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: dotnet-runtime-2.2 (>= 2.2.5) but it is not going to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.

Help me please.

@dagood
Copy link
Member

dagood commented Jun 20, 2019

You're using the Ubuntu 19.04 instructions, but actually the Ubuntu 18.04 instructions are more likely to work on Linux Mint 19.1. We don't have dropdown entries for some distros and there's no easy way to figure this out on your own, sorry about that. Someone else hit this problem earlier at #2836.

(#2576 is tracking making this clearer somehow.)

@dagood
Copy link
Member

dagood commented Jun 20, 2019

Duplicate of #2836

@dagood dagood marked this as a duplicate of #2836 Jun 20, 2019
@dagood dagood closed this as completed Jun 20, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants