Skip to content

[Documentation] Outdated Fedora versions references on package install #3077

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
rubemlrm opened this issue Jul 23, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

Comments

@rubemlrm
Copy link

Problem encountered on https://dotnet.microsoft.com/download/linux-package-manager/fedora28/sdk-2.2.301
Operating System: Linux Fedora 28 - x64

Provide details about the problem you are experiencing. Include your operating system version, exact error message, code sample, and anything else that is relevant.

In the documentation there are references to Fedora 27 and 28 when both of those versions was discontinued. Besides this i've tried to use the following link https://packages.microsoft.com/config/fedora/30/prod.repo pointing to the Fedora 30 and its working fine.
I've tried to find the documentation file to fix this, but without any success.

@danmoseley
Copy link
Member

@leecow it looks like https://dotnet.microsoft.com/download/linux-package-manager/fedora28/sdk-2.2.301 needs an update. Is that your page?

@dagood
Copy link
Member

dagood commented Jul 29, 2019

This is a known problem--there's a larger discussion/decision that needs to happen about keeping the distro list up to date: #2576.

I would expect the "F27" feed to work for F30. We don't actually produce packages that are specific to F30--they're the same RPMs. @rubemlrm, did you hit any installation problems, or is this only for the doc problem?

@rubemlrm
Copy link
Author

@dagood it's working without any problem, this is a doc problem only.
Thanks

@dagood
Copy link
Member

dagood commented Jul 30, 2019

Thanks for confirming! I've updated the title of #2576 and moved the comment about Fedora to the top to make it a little more visible, and I'm going to close this issue as a duplicate.

@dagood
Copy link
Member

dagood commented Jul 30, 2019

Duplicate of #2576

@dagood dagood marked this as a duplicate of #2576 Jul 30, 2019
@dagood dagood closed this as completed Jul 30, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants