-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
MLContext.Transform should be further organized #2361
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
I'd like to move schema operations into something like |
I do not think So I don't necessarily agree with the points in this issue? Is the fact that there are some transforms at the root of the hierarchy really so very bad? |
This is not applicable any longer since we have now release with the categories currently present in MLContext. When we will consider breaking changes, we might think about reorganizing MLContext. |
It seems that
MLContext.Transforms
can be further organized.In
MLContext.Transforms
it is possible to access many transforms directly:There are also subgroups:
Suggestions:
Transforms.Projections
.Question:
Does it even make sense to have some transforms in a subgroup, while others directly accessible?
/cc: @rogancarr, @sfilipi, @TomFinley
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: