Skip to content

Conversation

Whoaa512
Copy link

@Whoaa512 Whoaa512 commented Jan 4, 2017

No description provided.

@thenikso
Copy link
Contributor

thenikso commented Jan 9, 2017

this looks all right, I also like the documentation. However wouldn't it be easier to use a Access-Control-Allow-Headers: * instead?

@Whoaa512
Copy link
Author

Whoaa512 commented Jan 9, 2017

I agree that '*' is easier and will incorporate that change.

Also I think we could get closer to the serverless configuration (See)

Will try to incorporate that as well and see what you think.

@Whoaa512
Copy link
Author

Closing in favor of using serverless-offline

@Whoaa512 Whoaa512 closed this Jun 30, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants