From cb71c426dc86a2c57b4d00df30baa3935fb02334 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: pik4ez-canonical Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 14:07:05 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Fixed a few typos in quality.rst. --- quality.rst | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/quality.rst b/quality.rst index af1d486..201d250 100644 --- a/quality.rst +++ b/quality.rst @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Diátaxis is an approach to *quality* in documentation. "Quality" is a word in danger of losing some of its meaning; it's something we all approve of, but rarely risk trying to describe in any rigorous way. We want quality in our documentation, but much less often specify what exactly -what we mean by that. +we mean by that. All the same, we can generally point to examples of "high quality documentation" when asked, and can identify lapses in quality when we see @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ How we recognise deep quality Consider how we judge the quality of say, clothing. Clothes must have *functional quality* (they must keep us appropriately warm and dry, stand up to wear). These things are objectively measurable. You don't really need to -know much about clothes to assess how well they do those this. If water gets +know much about clothes to assess how well they do those things. If water gets in, or the clothing falls apart - it lacks quality. There are other characteristics of quality in clothing that can't simply be