size of 2.01

[Zeroes1]

flashfetch.exe 1.12.2.0 for win64 933,888 bytes
flashfetch.exe 2.0.1.0 now 4,076,544 bytes

2.0.1 is debug version? or code base up 4 times?

[CarterLi]

It was built with debug info

[CarterLi]

And I didn't see much performance difference which debug symbos stripped.

zhang@Parallels-ARM-Windows ~/f/build (dev)> ll fastfetch.exe
-rwxr-xr-x 1 zhang zhang 4.3M Aug 22 09:39 fastfetch.exe*
zhang@Parallels-ARM-Windows ~/f/build (dev)> cp fastfetch.exe debuginfo.exe
zhang@Parallels-ARM-Windows ~/f/build (dev)> strip fastfetch.exe
zhang@Parallels-ARM-Windows ~/f/build (dev)> ll fastfetch.exe
-rwxr-xr-x 1 zhang zhang 840K Aug 22 09:40 fastfetch.exe*
zhang@Parallels-ARM-Windows ~/f/build (dev)> ~/hyperfine.exe --warmup 3 'fastfetch.exe' 'debuginfo.exe'
Benchmark 1: fastfetch.exe
  Time (mean ± σ):      79.9 ms ±   7.6 ms    [User: 16.3 ms, System: 26.2 ms]
  Range (min … max):    73.2 ms …  91.5 ms    21 runs

  Warning: Statistical outliers were detected. Consider re-running this benchmark on a quiet PC without any interferences from other programs. It might help to use the '--warmup' or '--prepare' options.

Benchmark 2: debuginfo.exe
  Time (mean ± σ):      76.6 ms ±   5.8 ms    [User: 17.9 ms, System: 26.1 ms]
  Range (min … max):    72.7 ms …  89.5 ms    24 runs

  Warning: Statistical outliers were detected. Consider re-running this benchmark on a quiet PC without any interferences from other programs. It might help to use the '--warmup' or '--prepare' options.

Summary
  'debuginfo.exe' ran
    1.04 ± 0.13 times faster than 'fastfetch.exe'
zhang@Parallels-ARM-Windows ~/f/build (dev)> ./fastfetch --version
fastfetch 2.0.1 (aarch64)
zhang@Parallels-ARM-Windows ~/f/build (dev)> ./debuginfo --version
fastfetch 2.0.1 (aarch64)

[Zeroes1]

I'm not complaining about performance
I wish what my folder with many utilities have minimal size :)

[CarterLi]

If you insist, you may strip the debug symbol with strip in binutils