You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on May 27, 2024. It is now read-only.
This specification defines a standardized method for declaring copyright and
licensing for software projects. The goal of the specification is to have
unambiguous, machine-readable copyright and licensing information for each
individual file in a project.
I think @silverhook means that there is a big benefit of having copyright information in the files, not somewhere else like a DEP-5 file, because they will retain even if just a single file is copied from a project. Right?
I'm not sure if this is needed per se in the preamble of the spec. The spec itself already makes a clear recommendation of comment headers over DEP5. But here would be my suggestion:
This specification defines a standardized method for declaring copyright and
licensing for software projects. The goal of the specification is to have
unambiguous, machine-readable copyright and licensing information for each
individual file in a project. Ideally this information is embedded into every file,
so that the information is preserved when the file is copied and reused by third
parties.
Thread: #23 (comment)
Relevant section:
@silverhook
@carmenbianca
@mxmehl
@silverhook
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: