We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In #15092, we've introduced two notifications (in /plans and /teams once UBP is enabled) that have this text:
/plans
/teams
Your account has been enabled for usage-based billing. Discover faster workspace classes and only pay for what you actually use. [Learn more] The old monthly plans are deprecated and will be cancelled by End of March 2023.
Your account has been enabled for usage-based billing. Discover faster workspace classes and only pay for what you actually use. [Learn more]
The old monthly plans are deprecated and will be cancelled by End of March 2023.
However, this text has a few issues:
Too verbose, or uses unnecessary empty space. Focus on the personal account, not team plans or team billing. Sounds like the user has been part of a closed beta list and not accessing a GA feature on Gitpod.io. Voice and tone is not direct, using terms like discover. Lack of clear action. Do we want to provide an action for users or nudge to perform an action?
See comment
Current alternative proposals:
@gtsiolis's comment
To access large workspaces and pay-as-you-go, first cancel your existing plan. Existing plans will keep working until the end of March, 2023.
@jldec's comment, RFC (internal)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
jankeromnes
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe
In #15092, we've introduced two notifications (in
/plans
and/teams
once UBP is enabled) that have this text:However, this text has a few issues:
See comment
Describe the behaviour you'd like
Current alternative proposals:
@gtsiolis's comment
@jldec's comment, RFC (internal)
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: