spec: consistently use "defined type" and "type name" (cleanup)

When we introduced the notion of alias type declarations, we renamed
"named type" to "defined type" to avoid confusion with types denoted
by aliases and thus are also types with names, or "named types".

Some of the old uses of "named types" remained; this change removes
them.

Now the spec consistently uses the terms:

- "defined type"  for a type declared via a type definition
- "type name"     for any name denoting an (alias or defined) type
- "alias"         for a type name declared in an alias declaration

New prose is encouraged to avoid the term "named type" to counter-
act further confusion.

Fixes #23474.

Change-Id: I5fb59f1208baf958da79cf51ed3eb1411cd18e03
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/89115
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <[email protected]>

Author: griesemer

doc/go_spec.html

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 <!--{
 	"Title": "The Go Programming Language Specification",
-	"Subtitle": "Version of January 17, 2018",
+	"Subtitle": "Version of January 23, 2018",
 	"Path": "/ref/spec"
 }-->
 
@@ -694,9 +694,8 @@ <h2 id="Types">Types</h2>
 </pre>
 
 <p>
-Named instances of the boolean, numeric, and string types are
-<a href="#Predeclared_identifiers">predeclared</a>.
-Other named types are introduced with <a href="#Type_declarations">type declarations</a>.
+The language <a href="#Predeclared_identifiers">predeclares</a> certain type names.
+Others are introduced with <a href="#Type_declarations">type declarations</a>.
 <i>Composite types</i>&mdash;array, struct, pointer, function,
 interface, slice, map, and channel types&mdash;may be constructed using
 type literals.
@@ -1025,8 +1024,8 @@ <h3 id="Struct_types">Struct types</h3>
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Given a struct type <code>S</code> and a type named <code>T</code>,
-promoted methods are included in the method set of the struct as follows:
+Given a struct type <code>S</code> and a <a href="#Type_definitions">defined type</a>
+<code>T</code>, promoted methods are included in the method set of the struct as follows:
 </p>
 <ul>
 	<li>
@@ -2643,8 +2642,8 @@ <h3 id="Selectors">Selectors</h3>
 </li>
 
 <li>
-As an exception, if the type of <code>x</code> is a named pointer type
-and <code>(*x).f</code> is a valid selector expression denoting a field
+As an exception, if the type of <code>x</code> is a <a href="#Type_definitions">defined</a>
+pointer type and <code>(*x).f</code> is a valid selector expression denoting a field
 (but not a method), <code>x.f</code> is shorthand for <code>(*x).f</code>.
 </li>