Skip to content

6g does not implement new type compatibility definition #830

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
rsc opened this issue Jun 3, 2010 · 1 comment
Closed

6g does not implement new type compatibility definition #830

rsc opened this issue Jun 3, 2010 · 1 comment
Labels
FrozenDueToAge

Comments

@rsc
Copy link
Contributor

rsc commented Jun 3, 2010 

change 5565 made type compatibility non-recursive.
6g has not been updated
@rsc
Copy link
Contributor Author

rsc commented Jun 9, 2010

Comment 1:

This issue was closed by revision 565b5dc.

Status changed to Fixed.

@rsc rsc added fixed labels Jun 9, 2010
@rsc rsc self-assigned this Jun 9, 2010
@golang golang locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 24, 2016
@rsc rsc removed their assignment Jun 22, 2022
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
FrozenDueToAge
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@rsc @gopherbot