Skip to content

I think that merging 16.x.x into main repeatedly may have some negative consequences in terms of the linear history on main when it once again becomes the default branch. See further discussion in #4165 and #4171. #4280

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
Mhamaad35 opened this issue Nov 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed

I think that merging 16.x.x into main repeatedly may have some negative consequences in terms of the linear history on main when it once again becomes the default branch. See further discussion in #4165 and #4171. #4280

Mhamaad35 opened this issue Nov 2, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@Mhamaad35
Copy link 

          I think that merging 16.x.x into main repeatedly may have some negative consequences in terms of the linear history on main when it once again becomes the default branch. See further discussion in #4165 and #4171.

Overall, I would note that the churn around the incremental delivery has significantly decreased and that it might be possible to consider returning main to its default branch position.

Originally posted by @yaacovCR in #4131 (comment)
@Mhamaad35 Mhamaad35 closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Nov 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Mhamaad35