Basic: Enumerate the goals of the syntax more clearly

[msporny]

Gregg Kellogg wrote:

• Straight-forward representation of data in JSON using forms based on existing practice,
• Ability to represent data as triples (subject-predicate-object or entity-attribute-value),
• Ability to supplement with additional semantic information (e.g., @context for defining terms, prefixes and datatypes),
• Compatible with RDF data representations,
• Use of simple terms as attribute names,
• No requirement to provide datatyping information of values explicitly within representation (but ability to do so),
• Ability to represent relationship between an entity and one or more other entities, either by referencing document as a URI, to a representation included within the JSON-LD document, or as a sub-element of another entity

[msporny]

This is a very old bug... the goals of the syntax have been clearly outlined for some time now. Closing the issue.