Skip to content

Does a JSON-LD processor needs to support IRI normalization? #86

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
lanthaler opened this issue Mar 18, 2012 · 2 comments
Closed

Does a JSON-LD processor needs to support IRI normalization? #86

lanthaler opened this issue Mar 18, 2012 · 2 comments
Labels
api resolved spec-design syntax
Milestone
JSON-LD 1.0 API

Comments

@lanthaler
Copy link
Member

We still have to define whether we allow stuff like "../" and "./" in relative IRIs and suffixes. Doing so would require IRI normalization and that goes beyond pure textual concatenation for IRI exapnsion.

(This was discussed before as part of issue #46)
@lanthaler
Copy link
Member Author

RESOLVED: Conform to the requirements of RFC3986, Section 5 (Reference Resolution), when processing IRIs.

@lanthaler
Copy link
Member Author

Issue #74 is partly related to this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
api resolved spec-design syntax
Projects
None yet
Milestone
JSON-LD 1.0 API
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@lanthaler