samples: bpf: xdpsock: fix -Wmaybe-uninitialized

Fix two sort-of-false-positives in the xdpsock userspace part:

samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c: In function 'main':
samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c:1531:47: warning: 'tv_usec' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
 1531 |                         pktgen_hdr->tv_usec = htonl(tv_usec);
      |                                               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c:1500:26: note: 'tv_usec' was declared here
 1500 |         u32 idx, tv_sec, tv_usec;
      |                          ^~~~~~~
samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c:1530:46: warning: 'tv_sec' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
 1530 |                         pktgen_hdr->tv_sec = htonl(tv_sec);
      |                                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c:1500:18: note: 'tv_sec' was declared here
 1500 |         u32 idx, tv_sec, tv_usec;
      |                  ^~~~~~

Both variables are always initialized when @opt_tstamp == true and
they're being used also only when @opt_tstamp == true. However, that
variable comes from the BSS and is being toggled from another
function. They can't be executed simultaneously to actually trigger
undefined behaviour, but purely technically it is a correct warning.
Just initialize them with zeroes.

Fixes: eb68db4 ("samples/bpf: xdpsock: Add timestamp for Tx-only operation")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]>

Author: solbjorn

samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c

@@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ static void rx_drop_all(void)
 static int tx_only(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk, u32 *frame_nb,
 		   int batch_size, unsigned long tx_ns)
 {
-	u32 idx, tv_sec, tv_usec;
+	u32 idx, tv_sec = 0, tv_usec = 0;
 	unsigned int i;
 
 	while (xsk_ring_prod__reserve(&xsk->tx, batch_size, &idx) <