bpf: Fix excessive memory allocation in stack_map_alloc()

The 'n_buckets * (value_size + sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket))' part of the
allocated memory for 'smap' is never used after the memlock accounting was
removed, thus get rid of it.

[ Note, Daniel:

Commit b936ca6 ("bpf: rework memlock-based memory accounting for maps")
moved `cost += n_buckets * (value_size + sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket))`
up and therefore before the bpf_map_area_alloc() allocation, sigh. In a later
step commit c85d691 ("bpf: move memory size checks to bpf_map_charge_init()"),
and the overflow checks of `cost >= U32_MAX - PAGE_SIZE` moved into
bpf_map_charge_init(). And then 3708681 ("bpf: Eliminate rlimit-based
memory accounting for stackmap maps") finally removed the bpf_map_charge_init().
Anyway, the original code did the allocation same way as /after/ this fix. ]

Fixes: b936ca6 ("bpf: rework memlock-based memory accounting for maps")
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]

Author: ytcoode

kernel/bpf/stackmap.c

@@ -100,7 +100,6 @@ static struct bpf_map *stack_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 		return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
 
 	cost = n_buckets * sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket *) + sizeof(*smap);
-	cost += n_buckets * (value_size + sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket));
 	smap = bpf_map_area_alloc(cost, bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr));
 	if (!smap)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);