Implement fee spike reserve for channel initiators sending payments.

From lightning-rfc PR #740.

Author: valentinewallace

lightning/src/ln/channel.rs

@@ -3585,9 +3585,12 @@ impl<ChanSigner: ChannelKeys> Channel<ChanSigner> {
 			return Err(ChannelError::Ignore("Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept"));
 		}
 
+		// Add additional reserve that avoids stuck channels in the case of fee spikes.
+		let fee_spike_reserve = if self.channel_outbound { 2 * self.feerate_per_kw } else { 0 };
+
 		// Check self.their_channel_reserve_satoshis (the amount we must keep as
 		// reserve for them to have something to claim if we misbehave)
-		if self.value_to_self_msat < self.their_channel_reserve_satoshis * 1000 + amount_msat + htlc_outbound_value_msat + self.commit_tx_fee_outbound_htlc() {
+		if self.value_to_self_msat < self.their_channel_reserve_satoshis * 1000 + amount_msat + htlc_outbound_value_msat + self.commit_tx_fee_outbound_htlc() + fee_spike_reserve {
 			return Err(ChannelError::Ignore("Cannot send value that would put us over their reserve value"));
 		}
 

lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs

@@ -1522,7 +1522,6 @@ fn test_duplicate_htlc_different_direction_onchain() {
 }
 
 fn do_channel_reserve_test(test_recv: bool) {
-
 	let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
 	let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
 	let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
@@ -1556,6 +1555,7 @@ fn do_channel_reserve_test(test_recv: bool) {
 
 	let feemsat = 239; // somehow we know?
 	let total_fee_msat = (nodes.len() - 2) as u64 * 239;
+	let fee_spike_reserve = 2 * get_feerate!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
 
 	let recv_value_0 = stat01.their_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat - total_fee_msat;
 
@@ -1577,7 +1577,7 @@ fn do_channel_reserve_test(test_recv: bool) {
 	// nodes[0]'s wealth
 	loop {
 		let amt_msat = recv_value_0 + total_fee_msat;
-		if stat01.value_to_self_msat - amt_msat < stat01.channel_reserve_msat + stat01.commit_tx_fee_outbound {
+		if stat01.value_to_self_msat - amt_msat < stat01.channel_reserve_msat + stat01.commit_tx_fee_outbound + fee_spike_reserve {
 			break;
 		}
 		send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec![&nodes[1], &nodes[2]][..], recv_value_0, recv_value_0);
@@ -1598,7 +1598,7 @@ fn do_channel_reserve_test(test_recv: bool) {
 	}
 
 	{
-		let recv_value = stat01.value_to_self_msat - stat01.channel_reserve_msat - total_fee_msat - stat01.commit_tx_fee_outbound;
+		let recv_value = stat01.value_to_self_msat - stat01.channel_reserve_msat - total_fee_msat - stat01.commit_tx_fee_outbound - fee_spike_reserve;
 		// attempt to get channel_reserve violation
 		let (route, our_payment_hash, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(recv_value + 1);
 		let err = nodes[0].node.send_payment(route.clone(), our_payment_hash).err().unwrap();
@@ -1612,7 +1612,7 @@ fn do_channel_reserve_test(test_recv: bool) {
 
 	// adding pending output
 	let commit_tx_fee_1_acked_htlc = get_feerate!(nodes[0], chan_1.2) * COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC;
-	let recv_value_1 = (stat01.value_to_self_msat - stat01.channel_reserve_msat - total_fee_msat - stat01.commit_tx_fee_outbound - commit_tx_fee_1_acked_htlc)/2;
+	let recv_value_1 = (stat01.value_to_self_msat - stat01.channel_reserve_msat - total_fee_msat - stat01.commit_tx_fee_outbound - commit_tx_fee_1_acked_htlc - fee_spike_reserve)/2;
 	let amt_msat_1 = recv_value_1 + total_fee_msat;
 
 	let (route_1, our_payment_hash_1, our_payment_preimage_1) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(recv_value_1);
@@ -1627,7 +1627,7 @@ fn do_channel_reserve_test(test_recv: bool) {
 	nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event_1.msgs[0]);
 
 	// channel reserve test with htlc pending output > 0
-	let recv_value_2 = stat01.value_to_self_msat - amt_msat_1 - stat01.channel_reserve_msat - total_fee_msat - stat01.commit_tx_fee_outbound - commit_tx_fee_1_acked_htlc;
+	let recv_value_2 = stat01.value_to_self_msat - amt_msat_1 - stat01.channel_reserve_msat - total_fee_msat - stat01.commit_tx_fee_outbound - commit_tx_fee_1_acked_htlc - fee_spike_reserve;
 	{
 		let (route, our_payment_hash, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(recv_value_2 + 1);
 		match nodes[0].node.send_payment(route, our_payment_hash).err().unwrap() {
@@ -1684,7 +1684,7 @@ fn do_channel_reserve_test(test_recv: bool) {
 	let recv_value_22 = recv_value_2 - recv_value_21 - total_fee_msat - commit_tx_fee_1_holding_cell_htlc;
 	{
 		let stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
-		assert_eq!(stat.value_to_self_msat - (stat.pending_outbound_htlcs_amount_msat + recv_value_21 + recv_value_22 + total_fee_msat + total_fee_msat + commit_tx_fee_1_holding_cell_htlc + commit_tx_fee_1_acked_htlc + stat01.commit_tx_fee_outbound), stat.channel_reserve_msat);
+		assert_eq!(stat.value_to_self_msat - (stat.pending_outbound_htlcs_amount_msat + recv_value_21 + recv_value_22 + total_fee_msat + total_fee_msat + commit_tx_fee_1_holding_cell_htlc + commit_tx_fee_1_acked_htlc + stat01.commit_tx_fee_outbound + fee_spike_reserve), stat.channel_reserve_msat);
 	}
 
 	// now see if they go through on both sides
@@ -1794,7 +1794,7 @@ fn do_channel_reserve_test(test_recv: bool) {
 	let expected_value_to_self = stat01.value_to_self_msat - (recv_value_1 + total_fee_msat) - (recv_value_21 + total_fee_msat) - (recv_value_22 + total_fee_msat) - (recv_value_3 + total_fee_msat);
 	let stat0 = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
 	assert_eq!(stat0.value_to_self_msat, expected_value_to_self);
-	assert_eq!(stat0.value_to_self_msat, stat0.channel_reserve_msat + stat0.commit_tx_fee_outbound);
+	assert_eq!(stat0.value_to_self_msat, stat0.channel_reserve_msat + stat0.commit_tx_fee_outbound + fee_spike_reserve);
 
 	let stat2 = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[2], chan_2.2);
 	assert_eq!(stat2.value_to_self_msat, stat22.value_to_self_msat + recv_value_1 + recv_value_21 + recv_value_22 + recv_value_3);