Skip to content

P2641R4: Checking if a union alternative is active #105381

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
ldionne opened this issue Aug 20, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #107450
Open

P2641R4: Checking if a union alternative is active #105381

ldionne opened this issue Aug 20, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #107450
Labels
c++26 libc++ libc++ C++ Standard Library. Not GNU libstdc++. Not libc++abi. wg21 paper Issues representing the implementation of a WG21 paper

Comments

@ldionne
Copy link
Member

ldionne commented Aug 20, 2024

Link: https://wg21.link/P2641R4
@ldionne ldionne added c++26 libc++ libc++ C++ Standard Library. Not GNU libstdc++. Not libc++abi. wg21 paper Issues representing the implementation of a WG21 paper labels Aug 20, 2024
@Zingam
Copy link
Contributor

Zingam commented Sep 5, 2024

The required __builtin_is_within_lifetime is implemented in: #91895

@MitalAshok MitalAshok linked a pull request Sep 5, 2024 that will close this issue
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
c++26 libc++ libc++ C++ Standard Library. Not GNU libstdc++. Not libc++abi. wg21 paper Issues representing the implementation of a WG21 paper
Projects
libc++ Standards Conformance
Status: Todo
Milestone
No milestone
2 participants
@ldionne @Zingam