Skip to content

lld-link ignores section alignments greater than /ALIGN #137043

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
beetrees opened this issue Apr 23, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

lld-link ignores section alignments greater than /ALIGN #137043

beetrees opened this issue Apr 23, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@beetrees
Copy link
Contributor

The COFF object format supports section alignments up to 8192, whereas the default value of the /ALIGN command line argument (used as the alignment of all sections in the PE output) is 4096. If a section in a COFF object file has an alignment greater than the value of /ALIGN (such as in this Rust example), MSVC link.exe will exit with an LNK1164 linker error, whereas LLVM lld-link will ignore it and continue to use the smaller value of /ALIGN as the alignment of the sections in the PE output.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Apr 23, 2025

@llvm/issue-subscribers-lld-coff

Author: None (beetrees)

The COFF object format supports section alignments up to 8192, whereas the default value of the `/ALIGN` command line argument (used as the alignment of all sections in the PE output) is 4096. If a section in a COFF object file has an alignment greater than the value of `/ALIGN` (such as in [this Rust example](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/70144#issuecomment-2825245012)), MSVC `link.exe` will exit with an [LNK1164 linker error](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/error-messages/tool-errors/linker-tools-error-lnk1164?view=msvc-170), whereas LLVM `lld-link` will ignore it and continue to use the smaller value of `/ALIGN` as the alignment of the sections in the PE output.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants