Skip to content

4.2.0 milestone #149

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
manian-kumaran opened this issue May 28, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #135
Closed

4.2.0 milestone #149

manian-kumaran opened this issue May 28, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #135

Comments

@manian-kumaran
Copy link

Hi,

I noticed high activity at the end of 2021, and it stoped with 4.1.1 in Nov 2021 since then. Is this fork still maintained, and is there plan to release minor or major 4.2.0 version?

I want to use this node oauth2 server but I'm worried if the fork becomes unmaintained like its parent https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server

@jankapunkt
Copy link
Member

Hi @manian-kumaran yes we are still active. Currently things went good and stable which we had no pressure to release a newer version. I am moving things forward. Is there something in particular in 4.2.0 that you require?

@manian-kumaran
Copy link
Author

@jankapunkt Thank you.

It's good to know it's active and stable. I was more concerned since this package is for security and its parent is not actively maintained. I also read that this 4.1.1 contains bug fixes of the parent that was not released for a long time.

So, I'm quite happy to hear that this forked is actively maintained. I don't need anything particular or new features in 4.2.0. In fact, IMHO, for a security package, the less new features with breaking changes, the better. I prefer stability over new features.

Thanks.

@jankapunkt jankapunkt linked a pull request Jun 3, 2022 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants