Use nuxt-property-decorator instead vue-property-decorator in examples

[SyloRei]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In the class-api examples, the vue-property-decorator library was used. But this library does not contain all the parameters of the nuxt components.

Describe the solution you'd like
Use nuxt-property-decorator in examples. It is clearer for nuxt.

[NickBolles]

I'm pretty sure nuxt-property-decorator doesn't have any benefits over vue-property-decorator. Nuxt registers the hooks, which is essentially all that nuxt-property-decorator does, and re-exports everything from vue-property-decorator.

[SyloRei]

I'm pretty sure nuxt-property-decorator doesn't have any benefits over vue-property-decorator. Nuxt registers the hooks, which is essentially all that nuxt-property-decorator does, and re-exports everything from vue-property-decorator.

You are right, but when the application grows out of the current example / template and requires, for example, fetch or asyncData hook, the user of this example will be confused. Maybe he does not know about nuxt-property-decorator library.

[kevinmarrec]

@SyloRei Basic & Avanced examples that will be available here will showcase the use of fetch and asyncData around the component options.

Something you might not be aware is that layout for example can be either a string or function, and when you want it to be a string, defining a property layout within the class won't work, you'll need to give it to the component options. And I think this behavior is more likely to happen and bring more confusion than not talking about nuxt-property-decorator in first instance.

Furthermore, nuxt-property-decorator is, as said @NickBolles , kind of wrapper as it re-export everything and just register hooks. It also provide new decorators, and in the case they could be useful, the user can chose to use nuxt-property-decorator but they need to be aware that the package may not be released as fast as a new vue-property-decorator release comes out.

[SyloRei]

I agree, let's close