Skip to content

Scorecard olm-crds-have-resources-test failing when the owned is in the CSV #5269

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
camilamacedo86 opened this issue Sep 30, 2021 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. scorecard Issue relates to the scorecard subcomponent
Milestone

Comments

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor

Bug Report

Image:      quay.io/operator-framework/scorecard-test:v1.13.0
Entrypoint: [scorecard-test olm-crds-have-resources]
Labels:
	"suite":"olm"
	"test":"olm-crds-have-resources-test"
Results:
	Name: olm-crds-have-resources
	State: fail

	Errors:
		Owned CRDs do not have resources specified
	Log:
		Loaded ClusterServiceVersion: jaeger-operator.v1.25.0

What did you do?

Run scorecard for the bundle layer.zip: operator-sdk scorecard layer/

What did you expect to see?

All tests passing succefully.

What did you see instead? Under which circumstances?

Image:      quay.io/operator-framework/scorecard-test:v1.13.0
Entrypoint: [scorecard-test olm-crds-have-resources]
Labels:
	"suite":"olm"
	"test":"olm-crds-have-resources-test"
Results:
	Name: olm-crds-have-resources
	State: fail

	Errors:
		Owned CRDs do not have resources specified
	Log:
		Loaded ClusterServiceVersion: jaeger-operator.v1.25.0

Environment

$ operator-sdk version 1.13.0

$ go version (if language is Go) 1.16

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also, see that this checks are not tested: #4564

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. scorecard Issue relates to the scorecard subcomponent labels Oct 2, 2021
@asmacdo asmacdo added this to the Backlog milestone Oct 4, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 2, 2022
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/lifecycle frozen

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Feb 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. scorecard Issue relates to the scorecard subcomponent
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants