You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Maybe slicing uses the standard (excluding) python slice() for these dimensions and continues to use the (including) pandas slice for coordinates? Anyway, I find this slightly unexpected.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
To be honest, this wasn't entirely intentional: I didn't think about the difference in slice handling conventions between labeled and unlabeled arrays when we changed this in 0.9. But at this point, I would be loathe to change it.
I suppose this is also an argument in favor of changing the slice convention we copied from pandas to exclusive rather than inclusive of upper bounds.
This is a new behavior since 0.9 and has broken some of my scripts, I am not sure if this is intentional?
old, before 0.9:
new, since 0.9:
Maybe slicing uses the standard (excluding) python
slice()
for these dimensions and continues to use the (including) pandas slice for coordinates? Anyway, I find this slightly unexpected.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: