fix construction of in-place properties

This is an example of an in-place property: `bar = property(getter)`.
   They just create a nameless object, not the one with the name of
   the getter. Thus, the name was changed to
   "<property>". Furthermore, the definition of that property is not
   attached to any scope, as it's again nameless.

it's a part of the campaign to get rid of non-module roots

Author: temyurchenko

astroid/brain/brain_builtin_inference.py

@@ -645,12 +645,13 @@ def infer_property(
 
     prop_func = objects.Property(
         function=inferred,
-        name=inferred.name,
+        name="<property>",
         lineno=node.lineno,
         col_offset=node.col_offset,
+        # ↓ semantically, the definition of this property isn't within
+        # node.frame (or anywhere else, really)
+        parent=AstroidManager().adhoc_module,
     )
-    # Set parent outside __init__: https://github.com/pylint-dev/astroid/issues/1490
-    prop_func.parent = node
     prop_func.postinit(
         body=[],
         args=inferred.args,

tests/brain/test_builtin.py

@@ -14,17 +14,17 @@
 
 class BuiltinsTest(unittest.TestCase):
     def test_infer_property(self):
-        class_with_property = _extract_single_node(
+        property_assign = _extract_single_node(
             """
         class Something:
             def getter():
                 return 5
             asd = property(getter) #@
         """
         )
-        inferred_property = next(iter(class_with_property.value.infer()))
+        inferred_property = next(iter(property_assign.value.infer()))
         self.assertTrue(isinstance(inferred_property, objects.Property))
-        class_parent = inferred_property.parent.parent.parent
+        class_parent = property_assign.scope()
         self.assertIsInstance(class_parent, nodes.ClassDef)
         self.assertFalse(
             any(