Rename of branches is incorrect #1479
Assignees
Labels
Maintenance
Discussion or action around maintaining astroid or the dev workflow
Comments
DanielNoord
added
the
Maintenance
|
Yeap, that's me 😄 |
|
Renamed to |
|
@Pierre-Sassoulas Should we remove some of those maintenance branches? We don't really use those and you can checkout the tag if you want to see them. |
|
Yeah maybe all of them but the current one ? I was keeping them because they were there , but I think you're right. (And we really don't want to maintain astroid 2.1) |
|
Yeah I think so. I like to keep my branches clean as it shows what is actually being worked on within a project. |
|
I don't know what we should do with the 2.0 experimental branch now. |
|
Let's keep it around. There is no tag for it and it is good reference to look into for some open issues + what other solutions to common problems have been thgouht of. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
@Pierre-Sassoulas I think you might have done this, but I'm not sure.
Some time ago all branch names have been updated. This also included the
2.0branch intomaintenance/2.0.x. However, this was not the2.0.xbranch but rather a WIP branch for a complete overhaul ofastroid, which has sadly failed.See for example this issue #679, which refers to the branch and now links to the incorrectly named branch.
Since I did not do the change I do not know if there are any other branches that have been renamed incorrectly, but I would ask the person who did so to revisit the renaming and see if there are any other issues.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: