You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When we're given an explicit description type (Markdown, Rst, etc) we should attempt to render it during upload, and if it's invalid then we should hard fail the upload.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think this is only really applicable for reStructuredText, the markdown renderer will always return something even if it's not perfectly valid markdown (or even if it isn't actually markdown all).
Even if those renders always pass i think there is till value in doing it. For example it’s catch errors in cleaning the html as well. The general idea is that people semi regularly hit broken readme and avoiding that up front seems like a net positive.
On Mar 16, 2018, at 11:24 AM, Dustin Ingram ***@***.***> wrote:
I think this is only really applicable for reStructuredText, the markdown renderer will always return something even if it's not perfectly valid markdown (or even if it isn't actually markdown all).
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
It would be very valuable if any rendering error would at least be reported in the history tab; Currently it's hard to understand why the project description is suddenly displayed in plain text instead of rst.
When we're given an explicit description type (Markdown, Rst, etc) we should attempt to render it during upload, and if it's invalid then we should hard fail the upload.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: