-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
improve pipeline for user-facing feature-specific documentation #7817
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
What I'm thinking of would probably replace the help/FAQ page on PyPI, and would be user facing documentation specific to PyPI. It might be a reasonable place t move the user facing API docs too, or that might be better being housed in targeted API doc, I dunno. Mostly it seems like we have features we want to document on PyPI, and we currently don't really have a great answer for documenting those things. We kind of do a mish mash of adding things to our help/FAQ page (which is getting increasingly lengthy and cumbersome to organize), linking directly to PEPs (which really isn't the purpose of a PEP, they're change management not long term documentation), packaging.python.org (which sort of works, but is a separate repository so the dev experience isn't the greatest but that's maybe fine), and warehouse.readthedocs.io (which sort of holds api docs, but we basically ignore this documentation). Roughly to me it feels like documentation for PyPI for an end user is kind of a hodge podge of places, and I think that's because we don't really have a canonical answer for where PyPI gets documented at. This would roughly equal to pip.pypa.io, but for PyPI. |
#5947 stands out as a case that'd benefit from something like this. |
Triage: https://docs.pypi.org now exists, with user-focused documentation. This includes both the API docs (which were migrated from the dev-docs) as well as some of the information that was previously in As such, I think this can be closed, since the remaining items are piecemeal (the new doc structure exists, just needs to be rounded out)! |
Originally posted by @dstufft in #5838
Donald, could you talk a little more about what you mean re: a documentation pipeline for user-facing docs? Right now we have:
Am I right in understanding that you want a better system for inline/contextual instructions and other docs to display within features?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: