Skip to content

commonmark is archived and deprecated #13725

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
Avasam opened this issue Mar 27, 2025 · 1 comment · Fixed by #13736
Closed

commonmark is archived and deprecated #13725

Avasam opened this issue Mar 27, 2025 · 1 comment · Fixed by #13736
Labels
stubs: removal Pending removal of third-party distributions

Comments

@Avasam
Copy link
Collaborator

Avasam commented Mar 27, 2025

When reviewing #13724, I noticed that the commonmark repository is archived since March 25th, 2022
https://github.com/readthedocs/commonmark.py
And read readthedocs/commonmark.py#308

Image

It's also marked as deprecated in favor of https://github.com/executablebooks/markdown-it-py (which is also py.typed !)

Image
Image

Since the previously linked typeshed PR, our commonmark stubs are pretty complete, spare a few dict[str, Any] that could be private stubs-only TypedDict. (but I doubt it's worth the effort)

I propose we remove the stubs as per our Third-party library removal policy using the no_longer_updated field and an extra description pushing users to https://pypi.org/project/markdown-it-py/

This will also positively affect #9550

@Avasam Avasam added the stubs: removal Pending removal of third-party distributions label Mar 27, 2025
@Avasam Avasam changed the title commonmark is archived commonmark is archived and deprecated Mar 27, 2025
@srittau
Copy link
Collaborator

srittau commented Mar 28, 2025

I forced an update: https://pypi.org/project/types-commonmark/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
stubs: removal Pending removal of third-party distributions
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants