Skip to content

[Discussion] Start of the stdlib infra #1860

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
chenglou opened this issue Aug 7, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

[Discussion] Start of the stdlib infra #1860

chenglou opened this issue Aug 7, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@chenglou
Copy link
Member

chenglou commented Aug 7, 2017

This has been discussed a bit already, but I'd like to start some concrete action here so that folks can start contributing rather than asking us about it all the time.

I'm thinking of an independent repo (fully built with bsb), that bs can vendor; the repo will contain some explicitly experimental modules under a Experimental namespace for those who know what they're doing (aka lots of folks who are eager to see this happen in Discord).

To start the effort, I'd like to check in a dummy repo with a single function. Then we can discuss how to progress from there, e.g. the config needed.

@bassjacob
Copy link
Contributor

So where do we start?

@chenglou
Copy link
Member Author

chenglou commented Aug 8, 2017

I'd like @bobzhang to approve this idea first; we should reach some agreements, since Reason will default to the same thing.

@bobzhang
Copy link
Member

bobzhang commented Aug 8, 2017

Hi, let's wait for namespace to be landed in this release, should be within two weeks

@bobzhang
Copy link
Member

did not know we had this issue before : )

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants