Auto merge of #23654 - alexcrichton:rollup, r=alexcrichton

Author: bors

configure

@@ -479,10 +479,19 @@ esac
 # Detect 64 bit linux systems with 32 bit userland and force 32 bit compilation
 if [ $CFG_OSTYPE = unknown-linux-gnu -a $CFG_CPUTYPE = x86_64 ]
 then
-    file -L "$SHELL" | grep -q "x86[_-]64"
-    if [ $? != 0 ]; then
-        CFG_CPUTYPE=i686
+    # $SHELL does not exist in standard 'sh', so probably only exists
+    # if configure is running in an interactive bash shell. /usr/bin/env
+    # exists *everywhere*.
+    BIN_TO_PROBE="$SHELL"
+    if [ -z "$BIN_TO_PROBE" -a -e "/usr/bin/env" ]; then
+       BIN_TO_PROBE="/usr/bin/env"
     fi
+    if [ -n "$BIN_TO_PROBE" ]; then
+       file -L "$BIN_TO_PROBE" | grep -q "x86[_-]64"
+       if [ $? != 0 ]; then
+            CFG_CPUTYPE=i686
+       fi
+     fi
 fi
 
 

src/compiletest/compiletest.rs

@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
 #![feature(std_misc)]
 #![feature(test)]
 #![feature(path_ext)]
+#![feature(convert)]
+#![feature(str_char)]
 
 #![deny(warnings)]
 
@@ -115,7 +117,7 @@ pub fn parse_config(args: Vec<String> ) -> Config {
 
     fn opt_path(m: &getopts::Matches, nm: &str) -> PathBuf {
         match m.opt_str(nm) {
-            Some(s) => PathBuf::new(&s),
+            Some(s) => PathBuf::from(&s),
             None => panic!("no option (=path) found for {}", nm),
         }
     }
@@ -130,18 +132,18 @@ pub fn parse_config(args: Vec<String> ) -> Config {
         compile_lib_path: matches.opt_str("compile-lib-path").unwrap(),
         run_lib_path: matches.opt_str("run-lib-path").unwrap(),
         rustc_path: opt_path(matches, "rustc-path"),
-        clang_path: matches.opt_str("clang-path").map(|s| PathBuf::new(&s)),
+        clang_path: matches.opt_str("clang-path").map(|s| PathBuf::from(&s)),
         valgrind_path: matches.opt_str("valgrind-path"),
         force_valgrind: matches.opt_present("force-valgrind"),
-        llvm_bin_path: matches.opt_str("llvm-bin-path").map(|s| PathBuf::new(&s)),
+        llvm_bin_path: matches.opt_str("llvm-bin-path").map(|s| PathBuf::from(&s)),
         src_base: opt_path(matches, "src-base"),
         build_base: opt_path(matches, "build-base"),
         aux_base: opt_path(matches, "aux-base"),
         stage_id: matches.opt_str("stage-id").unwrap(),
         mode: matches.opt_str("mode").unwrap().parse().ok().expect("invalid mode"),
         run_ignored: matches.opt_present("ignored"),
         filter: filter,
-        logfile: matches.opt_str("logfile").map(|s| PathBuf::new(&s)),
+        logfile: matches.opt_str("logfile").map(|s| PathBuf::from(&s)),
         runtool: matches.opt_str("runtool"),
         host_rustcflags: matches.opt_str("host-rustcflags"),
         target_rustcflags: matches.opt_str("target-rustcflags"),

src/compiletest/header.rs

@@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ pub struct TestProps {
     pub check_stdout: bool,
     // Don't force a --crate-type=dylib flag on the command line
     pub no_prefer_dynamic: bool,
-    // Don't run --pretty expanded when running pretty printing tests
-    pub no_pretty_expanded: bool,
+    // Run --pretty expanded when running pretty printing tests
+    pub pretty_expanded: bool,
     // Which pretty mode are we testing with, default to 'normal'
     pub pretty_mode: String,
     // Only compare pretty output and don't try compiling
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ pub fn load_props(testfile: &Path) -> TestProps {
     let mut force_host = false;
     let mut check_stdout = false;
     let mut no_prefer_dynamic = false;
-    let mut no_pretty_expanded = false;
+    let mut pretty_expanded = false;
     let mut pretty_mode = None;
     let mut pretty_compare_only = false;
     let mut forbid_output = Vec::new();
@@ -96,8 +96,8 @@ pub fn load_props(testfile: &Path) -> TestProps {
             no_prefer_dynamic = parse_no_prefer_dynamic(ln);
         }
 
-        if !no_pretty_expanded {
-            no_pretty_expanded = parse_no_pretty_expanded(ln);
+        if !pretty_expanded {
+            pretty_expanded = parse_pretty_expanded(ln);
         }
 
         if pretty_mode.is_none() {
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ pub fn load_props(testfile: &Path) -> TestProps {
         force_host: force_host,
         check_stdout: check_stdout,
         no_prefer_dynamic: no_prefer_dynamic,
-        no_pretty_expanded: no_pretty_expanded,
+        pretty_expanded: pretty_expanded,
         pretty_mode: pretty_mode.unwrap_or("normal".to_string()),
         pretty_compare_only: pretty_compare_only,
         forbid_output: forbid_output,
@@ -295,8 +295,8 @@ fn parse_no_prefer_dynamic(line: &str) -> bool {
     parse_name_directive(line, "no-prefer-dynamic")
 }
 
-fn parse_no_pretty_expanded(line: &str) -> bool {
-    parse_name_directive(line, "no-pretty-expanded")
+fn parse_pretty_expanded(line: &str) -> bool {
+    parse_name_directive(line, "pretty-expanded")
 }
 
 fn parse_pretty_mode(line: &str) -> Option<String> {
@@ -328,10 +328,10 @@ fn parse_exec_env(line: &str) -> Option<(String, String)> {
 
 fn parse_pp_exact(line: &str, testfile: &Path) -> Option<PathBuf> {
     match parse_name_value_directive(line, "pp-exact") {
-      Some(s) => Some(PathBuf::new(&s)),
+      Some(s) => Some(PathBuf::from(&s)),
       None => {
         if parse_name_directive(line, "pp-exact") {
-            testfile.file_name().map(|s| PathBuf::new(s))
+            testfile.file_name().map(|s| PathBuf::from(s))
         } else {
             None
         }
@@ -340,7 +340,8 @@ fn parse_pp_exact(line: &str, testfile: &Path) -> Option<PathBuf> {
 }
 
 fn parse_name_directive(line: &str, directive: &str) -> bool {
-    line.contains(directive)
+    // This 'no-' rule is a quick hack to allow pretty-expanded and no-pretty-expanded to coexist
+    line.contains(directive) && !line.contains(&("no-".to_string() + directive))
 }
 
 pub fn parse_name_value_directive(line: &str, directive: &str)

src/compiletest/runtest.rs

@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ fn run_pretty_test(config: &Config, props: &TestProps, testfile: &Path) {
     if !proc_res.status.success() {
         fatal_proc_rec("pretty-printed source does not typecheck", &proc_res);
     }
-    if props.no_pretty_expanded { return }
+    if !props.pretty_expanded { return }
 
     // additionally, run `--pretty expanded` and try to build it.
     let proc_res = print_source(config, props, testfile, srcs[round].clone(), "expanded");
@@ -1440,7 +1440,7 @@ fn aux_output_dir_name(config: &Config, testfile: &Path) -> PathBuf {
 }
 
 fn output_testname(testfile: &Path) -> PathBuf {
-    PathBuf::new(testfile.file_stem().unwrap())
+    PathBuf::from(testfile.file_stem().unwrap())
 }
 
 fn output_base_name(config: &Config, testfile: &Path) -> PathBuf {

src/doc/intro.md

@@ -446,16 +446,16 @@ It gives us this error:
 error: aborting due to previous error
 ```
 
-It mentions that "captured outer variable in an `FnMut` closure".
-Because we declared the closure as a moving closure, and it referred
-to `numbers`, the closure will try to take ownership of the
-vector. But the closure itself is created in a loop, and hence we will
-actually create three closures, one for every iteration of the
-loop. This means that all three of those closures would try to own
-`numbers`, which is impossible -- `numbers` must have just one
-owner. Rust detects this and gives us the error: we claim that
-`numbers` has ownership, but our code tries to make three owners. This
-may cause a safety problem, so Rust disallows it.
+This is a little confusing because there are two closures here: the one passed
+to `map`, and the one passed to `thread::scoped`. In this case, the closure for
+`thread::scoped` is attempting to reference `numbers`, a `Vec<i32>`. This
+closure is a `FnOnce` closure, as that’s what `thread::scoped` takes as an
+argument. `FnOnce` closures take ownership of their environment. That’s fine,
+but there’s one detail: because of `map`, we’re going to make three of these
+closures. And since all three try to take ownership of `numbers`, that would be
+a problem. That’s what it means by ‘cannot move out of captured outer
+variable’: our `thread::scoped` closure wants to take ownership, and it can’t,
+because the closure for `map` won’t let it.
 
 What to do here? Rust has two types that helps us: `Arc<T>` and `Mutex<T>`.
 *Arc* stands for "atomically reference counted". In other words, an Arc will

src/doc/reference.md

@@ -816,8 +816,7 @@ may optionally begin with any number of `attributes` that apply to the
 containing module. Attributes on the anonymous crate module define important
 metadata that influences the behavior of the compiler.
 
-```{.rust}
-# #![allow(unused_attribute)]
+```no_run
 // Crate name
 #![crate_name = "projx"]
 
@@ -1020,6 +1019,7 @@ Use declarations support a number of convenient shortcuts:
 An example of `use` declarations:
 
 ```
+# #![feature(core)]
 use std::iter::range_step;
 use std::option::Option::{Some, None};
 use std::collections::hash_map::{self, HashMap};
@@ -1080,6 +1080,7 @@ declarations.
 An example of what will and will not work for `use` items:
 
 ```
+# #![feature(core)]
 # #![allow(unused_imports)]
 use foo::core::iter;  // good: foo is at the root of the crate
 use foo::baz::foobaz;    // good: foo is at the root of the crate
@@ -1781,6 +1782,7 @@ functions, with the exception that they may not have a body and are instead
 terminated by a semicolon.
 
 ```
+# #![feature(libc)]
 extern crate libc;
 use libc::{c_char, FILE};
 

src/doc/trpl/compound-data-types.md

@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ This pattern is very powerful, and we'll see it repeated more later.
 
 There are also a few things you can do with a tuple as a whole, without
 destructuring. You can assign one tuple into another, if they have the same
-contained types and arity. Tuples have the same arity when they have the same
+contained types and [arity]. Tuples have the same arity when they have the same
 length.
 
 ```rust
@@ -196,8 +196,9 @@ Now, we have actual names, rather than positions. Good names are important,
 and with a struct, we have actual names.
 
 There _is_ one case when a tuple struct is very useful, though, and that's a
-tuple struct with only one element. We call this a *newtype*, because it lets
-you create a new type that's similar to another one:
+tuple struct with only one element. We call this the *newtype* pattern, because
+it allows you to create a new type, distinct from that of its contained value
+and expressing its own semantic meaning:
 
 ```{rust}
 struct Inches(i32);
@@ -216,7 +217,7 @@ destructuring `let`, as we discussed previously in 'tuples.' In this case, the
 
 Finally, Rust has a "sum type", an *enum*. Enums are an incredibly useful
 feature of Rust, and are used throughout the standard library. An `enum` is
-a type which ties a set of alternates to a specific name. For example, below
+a type which relates a set of alternates to a specific name. For example, below
 we define `Character` to be either a `Digit` or something else. These
 can be used via their fully scoped names: `Character::Other` (more about `::`
 below).
@@ -228,8 +229,8 @@ enum Character {
 }
 ```
 
-An `enum` variant can be defined as most normal types. Below are some example
-types which also would be allowed in an `enum`.
+Most normal types are allowed as the variant components of an `enum`. Here are
+some examples:
 
 ```rust
 struct Empty;
@@ -239,15 +240,15 @@ struct Status { Health: i32, Mana: i32, Attack: i32, Defense: i32 }
 struct HeightDatabase(Vec<i32>);
 ```
 
-So you see that depending on the sub-datastructure, the `enum` variant, same as
-a struct, may or may not hold data. That is, in `Character`, `Digit` is a name
-tied to an `i32` where `Other` is just a name. However, the fact that they are
-distinct makes this very useful.
+You see that, depending on its type, an `enum` variant may or may not hold data.
+In `Character`, for instance, `Digit` gives a meaningful name for an `i32`
+value, where `Other` is only a name. However, the fact that they represent
+distinct categories of `Character` is a very useful property.
 
-As with structures, enums don't by default have access to operators such as
-compare ( `==` and `!=`), binary operations (`*` and `+`), and order
-(`<` and `>=`). As such, using the previous `Character` type, the
-following code is invalid:
+As with structures, the variants of an enum by default are not comparable with
+equality operators (`==`, `!=`), have no ordering (`<`, `>=`, etc.), and do not
+support other binary operations such as `*` and `+`. As such, the following code
+is invalid for the example `Character` type:
 
 ```{rust,ignore}
 // These assignments both succeed
@@ -265,9 +266,10 @@ let four_equals_ten = four == ten;
 ```
 
 This may seem rather limiting, but it's a limitation which we can overcome.
-There are two ways: by implementing equality ourselves, or by using the
-[`match`][match] keyword. We don't know enough about Rust to implement equality
-yet, but we can use the `Ordering` enum from the standard library, which does:
+There are two ways: by implementing equality ourselves, or by pattern matching
+variants with [`match`][match] expressions, which you'll learn in the next
+chapter. We don't know enough about Rust to implement equality yet, but we can
+use the `Ordering` enum from the standard library, which does:
 
 ```
 enum Ordering {
@@ -277,9 +279,8 @@ enum Ordering {
 }
 ```
 
-Because we did not define `Ordering`, we must import it (from the std
-library) with the `use` keyword. Here's an example of how `Ordering` is
-used:
+Because `Ordering` has already been defined for us, we will import it with the
+`use` keyword. Here's an example of how it is used:
 
 ```{rust}
 use std::cmp::Ordering;
@@ -313,17 +314,17 @@ the standard library if you need them.
 
 Okay, let's talk about the actual code in the example. `cmp` is a function that
 compares two things, and returns an `Ordering`. We return either
-`Ordering::Less`, `Ordering::Greater`, or `Ordering::Equal`, depending on if
-the two values are less, greater, or equal. Note that each variant of the
-`enum` is namespaced under the `enum` itself: it's `Ordering::Greater` not
-`Greater`.
+`Ordering::Less`, `Ordering::Greater`, or `Ordering::Equal`, depending on
+whether the first value is less than, greater than, or equal to the second. Note
+that each variant of the `enum` is namespaced under the `enum` itself: it's
+`Ordering::Greater`, not `Greater`.
 
 The `ordering` variable has the type `Ordering`, and so contains one of the
 three values. We then do a bunch of `if`/`else` comparisons to check which
 one it is.
 
-This `Ordering::Greater` notation is too long. Let's use `use` to import the
-`enum` variants instead. This will avoid full scoping:
+This `Ordering::Greater` notation is too long. Let's use another form of `use`
+to import the `enum` variants instead. This will avoid full scoping:
 
 ```{rust}
 use std::cmp::Ordering::{self, Equal, Less, Greater};
@@ -347,16 +348,18 @@ fn main() {
 ```
 
 Importing variants is convenient and compact, but can also cause name conflicts,
-so do this with caution. It's considered good style to rarely import variants
-for this reason.
+so do this with caution. For this reason, it's normally considered better style
+to `use` an enum rather than its variants directly.
 
-As you can see, `enum`s are quite a powerful tool for data representation, and are
-even more useful when they're [generic][generics] across types. Before we
-get to generics, though, let's talk about how to use them with pattern matching, a
-tool that will let us deconstruct this sum type (the type theory term for enums)
-in a very elegant way and avoid all these messy `if`/`else`s.
+As you can see, `enum`s are quite a powerful tool for data representation, and
+are even more useful when they're [generic][generics] across types. Before we
+get to generics, though, let's talk about how to use enums with pattern
+matching, a tool that will let us deconstruct sum types (the type theory term
+for enums) like `Ordering` in a very elegant way that avoids all these messy
+and brittle `if`/`else`s.
 
 
+[arity]: ./glossary.html#arity
 [match]: ./match.html
 [game]: ./guessing-game.html#comparing-guesses
 [generics]: ./generics.html