From 5cbb27ff90b6685a27492dc2b1a23074e6194f9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paolo Barbolini <paolo.barbolini@m4ss.net>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2025 16:29:22 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Suggest `retain_mut` over `retain` as `Vec::extract_if`
 alternative

---
 library/alloc/src/vec/mod.rs | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/library/alloc/src/vec/mod.rs b/library/alloc/src/vec/mod.rs
index 65a83cb98ba6a..72279e12192bc 100644
--- a/library/alloc/src/vec/mod.rs
+++ b/library/alloc/src/vec/mod.rs
@@ -3659,9 +3659,9 @@ impl<T, A: Allocator> Vec<T, A> {
     ///
     /// If the returned `ExtractIf` is not exhausted, e.g. because it is dropped without iterating
     /// or the iteration short-circuits, then the remaining elements will be retained.
-    /// Use [`retain`] with a negated predicate if you do not need the returned iterator.
+    /// Use [`retain_mut`] with a negated predicate if you do not need the returned iterator.
     ///
-    /// [`retain`]: Vec::retain
+    /// [`retain_mut`]: Vec::retain_mut
     ///
     /// Using this method is equivalent to the following code:
     ///