You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Can we please have an initial minor-version release, and perhaps even have a policy that when crates are merged, they should be published at the same time- especially while it's pre-1.0?
I'm sure everyone wants gloo on crates.io, and there's no real need to elaborate further... but...
One of the best ways to increase adoption of Rust->WASM in general is to show actual usable demos on the web.
Yet one of the most essential building-blocks that will need to be there for pretty much any demo is going to be event listeners. gloo-events in particular is probably the right way to handle that. So holding it back might be having a bigger impact than it seems.
I guess it's debatable since nothing stops people from pulling in gloo from github and then building an app, but it does stop third-party higher level libraries from depending on gloo.
(for example, I'm currently stuck from publishing an update to awsm since I added gloo-events as a dependency)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I propose we release the current items as a crate, and start adding things like fetch and router. We can change things later. Other things like an API for interchanging views should be straightfwd, albeit opinionated.
Can we please have an initial minor-version release, and perhaps even have a policy that when crates are merged, they should be published at the same time- especially while it's pre-1.0?
I'm sure everyone wants
gloo
on crates.io, and there's no real need to elaborate further... but...One of the best ways to increase adoption of Rust->WASM in general is to show actual usable demos on the web.
Yet one of the most essential building-blocks that will need to be there for pretty much any demo is going to be event listeners.
gloo-events
in particular is probably the right way to handle that. So holding it back might be having a bigger impact than it seems.I guess it's debatable since nothing stops people from pulling in gloo from github and then building an app, but it does stop third-party higher level libraries from depending on gloo.
(for example, I'm currently stuck from publishing an update to awsm since I added gloo-events as a dependency)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: