Update 2017-05-08-sip-minutes.md

Author: darjutak

_sips/minutes/2017-05-08-sip-minutes.md

@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ Refers to the paper “Denotation” he linked in a proposal, that is not enough
 
 **Jorge** is getting back discussion on voting on this proposal and he mentioned that Josh insisted on more examples and suggestions on motivation of this SIP.
 
-**Eugene** wanted to add more syntax (map and flatmap), but Martin opposed to that saying that Scala is quite serious program and needs more reason to add any additional syntax to it. **Martin** would like to see more widespread use of common attic constructs and Libraries, and before doing that, he wouldn’t consider any further change. **Sebastian** agrees with Martin and says that he doesn’t really understand Josh’s and Eugene’s proposal. **Iulian** agrees that the proposal is quite complicated and he wonders how it can be useful. He believes that it is an interesting research direction, but that it needs more users feedbacks in aim to be included in the Scala, therefore questioning if the proposal should be numbered in the current form. Seth and Adriaan agree with Martin and Iulian.
+**Eugene** wanted to add more syntax (map and flatmap), but **Martin** opposed to that saying that Scala is quite serious program and needs more reason to add any additional syntax to it. **Martin** would like to see more widespread use of comonadic constructs and Libraries, and before doing that, he wouldn’t consider any further change. **Sebastian** agrees with Martin and says that he doesn’t really understand Josh’s and Eugene’s proposal. **Iulian** agrees that the proposal is quite complicated and he wonders how it can be useful. He believes that it is an interesting research direction, but that it needs more users feedbacks in aim to be included in the Scala, therefore questioning if the proposal should be numbered in the current form. Seth and Adriaan agree with Martin and Iulian.
 
 **Conclusion** Proposal discarded unanimously. They will send the feedback to the author.