From 08d07bb658c06c8b6c11a17f659f9096e12ce304 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wojciech Mazur <wmazur@virtuslab.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2024 12:16:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Specialize the printer in TreeChecker

[Cherry-picked bdbf2058fd13ecf538d480bdbea68df37722db92][modified]
---
 compiler/src/dotty/tools/dotc/transform/TreeChecker.scala | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/compiler/src/dotty/tools/dotc/transform/TreeChecker.scala b/compiler/src/dotty/tools/dotc/transform/TreeChecker.scala
index b10ed64e6d5a..d18ffcd252d5 100644
--- a/compiler/src/dotty/tools/dotc/transform/TreeChecker.scala
+++ b/compiler/src/dotty/tools/dotc/transform/TreeChecker.scala
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 package dotty.tools.dotc
 package transform
 
+import config.Printers.checks as printer
 import core.Names.Name
 import core.DenotTransformers.*
 import core.SymDenotations.*
@@ -415,7 +416,7 @@ object TreeChecker {
         res
       catch case NonFatal(ex) if !ctx.run.enrichedErrorMessage =>
         val treeStr = tree.show(using ctx.withPhase(ctx.phase.prev.megaPhase))
-        println(ctx.run.enrichErrorMessage(s"exception while retyping $treeStr of class ${tree.className} # ${tree.uniqueId}"))
+        printer.println(ctx.run.enrichErrorMessage(s"exception while retyping $treeStr of class ${tree.className} # ${tree.uniqueId}"))
         throw ex
     }
 
@@ -782,7 +783,7 @@ object TreeChecker {
       // We want make sure that transparent inline macros are checked in the same way that
       // non transparent macros are, so we try to prepare a context which would make
       // the checks behave the same way for both types of macros.
-      // 
+      //
       // E.g. Different instances of skolem types are by definition not able to be a subtype of
       // one another, however in practice this is only upheld during typer phase, and we do not want
       // it to be upheld during this check.