Skip to content

Recent flakiness of the bot? #103

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
ivirshup opened this issue Jun 26, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

Recent flakiness of the bot? #103

ivirshup opened this issue Jun 26, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@ivirshup
Copy link

Hey,

We've been noticing some flakiness of the bot on our projects:

But also that there's a new bot name on some PRs, e.g. scverse/scanpy#2235 (comment)

image

image

Any idea what's up/ if these things are connected? I don't think we've touched the CI on our end... @Carreau, are you going through with the changes you'd mentioned wanting to make at the scientific python summit (/ #99)?

cc: @flying-sheep

@Carreau
Copy link
Contributor

Carreau commented Jun 26, 2023

The change of name is because we try to migrate the bot during a workshop but ran out of time, so rolled back. It might re-migrate during SciPy if the "new-name"/"new avatar" shows it's weird.

@ivirshup
Copy link
Author

Ah, looks like we did sorta touch the CI.

Thanks for the quick feedback!

Should I be expecting the command (e.g. @meeseeksdev backport to ...) to change around then?

@lumberbot-app
Copy link
Contributor

lumberbot-app bot commented Jun 26, 2023

Awww, sorry ivirshup you do not seem to be allowed to do that, please ask a repository maintainer.

@flying-sheep
Copy link

guess the bot should start ignoring text when it’s in code blocks

@Carreau
Copy link
Contributor

Carreau commented Jun 26, 2023

guess the bot should start ignoring text when it’s in code blocks

Haha, yes, I'll try to have a proper parsing one day

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants