Use European platform instead of GitHub #1124
Replies: 11 comments 2 replies
-
I believe using an open-source alternative to GitHub is fine, but I don’t think geography should be a factor in open-source projects. IMHO, considering practical factors like compliance, reliability, or privacy would make the argument stronger. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I totally agree, we want to stop depending of Google, but not of Microsoft. It doesn't make sense. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
There is also this (new ?) project that can host open source projects: https://codeberg.org/ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
If this will be moved somewhere, it should stay in github as a read-only mirror, so it can compete in the stars chart. 11k stars is pretty amazing, I guess it will be one of the top projects in collaborative document editing categories. It can bring new people to the project. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@stardust85 not sure about codeberg, but gitlab has a mirror feature that can be set up to automatically push changes to another remote, in this case GitHub. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Codeberg is running Forgejo, which offers some mirror functionality (both pulling and pushing, the docs have examples for both): I would really like to see this on codeberg, with mirrors at Github and Gitlab if desired. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Is gitlab any better nowadays? At least it's not Google/Ms owned.... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Depends on what was bad before, as I'm not sure what to compare "nowadays" to. I'm basically a gitlab Fanboy though, I loved what they did from the beginning of me using open source. It basically just started because they had free private repos that GitHub didn't have back then, and cemented when I realised how complicated GitHub action are in that they are an abstraction level above gitlab by default basically, which makes it harder to learn when used to gitlab's default way of "use this docker image, run this script" kind of pipeline definition. I use GitHub because most open source repos are here, but I always prefer gitlab. Take everything with a grain of salt, as I said I'm basically a gitlab Fanboy. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@Regenhardt |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes the company is american, which is why their own SaaS, gitlab.com, should not be that high on the ladder here. However code.europa.eu and opencode.de are run by EU and Germany and therefore do not fall under Patriot/CLOUD act. code.europa.eu is probably complicated to get into. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Self-host a forgejo instance maybe? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Since this is an open, european development, it would be nice to also be hosted on an open, european platform.
Most fitting would probably be code.europa.eu, if that is possible.
Another possibility would be opencode.de, which is Germany's open code platform.
Both are gitlab instances in public hand and therefore open source and under purely european control.
There might be other alternatives I don't know about of course.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions