Skip to content

Describe Tarantool features in common DBMS terms #1467

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
ligurio opened this issue Aug 17, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #3054
Closed

Describe Tarantool features in common DBMS terms #1467

ligurio opened this issue Aug 17, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #3054
Labels
add details [nature] More details needed, some info missing. Documentation is incomplete. manual [location] Tarantool manual, no definite location

Comments

@ligurio
Copy link
Member

ligurio commented Aug 17, 2020

Tarantool is a complex system that stores user data.
I think users want to know guarantees that Tarantool provides before start to use it. Unfortunately we don't have any description of tarantool guarantees in common DBMS terms, like 'consistency model', 'transation isolation level', 'ACID/BASE', 'MVCC' etc.

I've tried to search this in documentation and failed.

What isolation levels tarantool uses? Search in documentation found only two relevant pages: Transaction control and SQL. Both pages doesn't contain answers for the question. On page about SQL: "SET TRANSACTION statement ISOLATION SERIALIZABLE clause | SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE; | Fail. Syntax error.". Well, but what isolation levels are supported then?

Transaction control describes atomicity support and isolation. What about durability and consistency?

This page contains good description of possible consistency models.

Also it's worth to mention that we don't support transaction for DDL.

Examples:

@lenkis lenkis added add details [nature] More details needed, some info missing. Documentation is incomplete. manual [location] Tarantool manual, no definite location labels Sep 8, 2020
@lenkis lenkis added the need feedback [special status] On hold, awaiting feedback label Sep 8, 2020
@ligurio
Copy link
Member Author

ligurio commented Feb 9, 2021

@lenkis What kind of feedback do you need?

@pgulutzan
Copy link
Contributor

I think this refers to the situation that existed before version 2.6.1 when memtx_use_mvcc_engine arrived.
Before that we could say "serializable" because everything really was serialized.
Now it is not necessarily so, and the manual does mention snapshot and serializable, e.g. here:
https://www.tarantool.io/en/doc/latest/book/box/atomic/#transactional-manager
I regret that I think there might some flaws related to that claim, e.g. here
tarantool/tarantool#5801

@Totktonada
Copy link
Member

Now we're going deeper: #2793.

@patiencedaur patiencedaur removed the need feedback [special status] On hold, awaiting feedback label Jul 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
add details [nature] More details needed, some info missing. Documentation is incomplete. manual [location] Tarantool manual, no definite location
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants