Update agenda.md

Author: aphillips

meetings/agenda.md

@@ -45,19 +45,60 @@ To request that the chair add an agenda item, send email to the message-format-w
 
 Discussion of the function registry. Two of the three models had sections on this.
 
-**Topic:** Bidi
-* Requested by: EAO
+---
 
-Discussion of bidirectional text handling. See:
-* https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/pull/315
+**Über-topic**: ABNF
 
-**Topic:** (Discussion) Guidance needed for dealing with selector explosions
+_We need to decide if the ABNF changes are ready to commit. As suspected, writing the ABNF exposed a host of other issues for discussion. But let's start with deciding to commit this ABNF (or request more edits) and then proceed to discuss issues that might modify it._
+
+* https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/pull/347
+
+
+**Topic:** First-match vs. best-match
+* Requested by: APP
+* https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/issues/351
+
+**Topic:** whitespace in the EBNF
+* Requested by: APP, STA
+
+_This topic appears to be done, but let's make sure we agree on the whitespace handling._
+
+* https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/issues/340
+
+**Topic:** Delimiter for literals
 * Requested by: STA
-* https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/discussions/323
+* https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/issues/263
+
+_@stasm reopened this as part of our ABNF work. We need to close on whether to keep `(` and `)` for literals or switch to `|`_
+
+**Topic:** Markup
+* Requested by: APP, MIH
+* https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/issues/356
+
+_@mihnita has called out that our decisions about markup might be premature. Meanwhile, based solely on consistency and the ABNF work, @aphillips has a PR adding a markup error. Let's discuss markup._
 
+@mihnita notes:
+
+> Markup open issues:
+> * https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/issues/241
+> * https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/issues/262
+> * https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/issues/238
+>
+> And to show that it was not agreed on, see PR https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/pull/283 in Jun 21, 2022:
+>> I will approve it to move things forward and not have these many open PRs.
+>>  It does not mean I agree with this syntax, so it should not be hold against me 1 month from now ("but you approved X")
+>>  There are still at least 2 open issues arguing about how to best handle "markup elements"
 
 ---
 
 ## Proposed for Future (or if time permits)
 
+**Topic:** Bidi
+* Requested by: EAO
 
+Discussion of bidirectional text handling. See:
+* https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/pull/315
+
+**Topic:** (Discussion) Guidance needed for dealing with selector explosions
+* Requested by: STA
+* https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/discussions/323