You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The TD taskforce is discussing making contentType optional.
It is not only about ExpectedResponse and AdditionalExpectedResponse.
There are discussions that contentType MAY become optional in general and there is no default value kicking in like we do now with application/json.
I think we should try to understand the consequences (if any) from the Scripting API point of view.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In real life not much consequence, since the underlying platform for Scripting includes bindings.
Anyway we should make sure to specify the applicable fallbacks.
When contentType is not available, the content could (should) be presented as null, or a byte stream, or byte array (based on the quoted discussion the latter would be enough).
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
The TD taskforce is discussing making
contentType
optional.It is not only about
ExpectedResponse
andAdditionalExpectedResponse
.There are discussions that
contentType
MAY become optional in general and there is no default value kicking in like we do now withapplication/json
.I think we should try to understand the consequences (if any) from the Scripting API point of view.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: