Skip to content

Subscription stop misses InteractionInput ? #569

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
danielpeintner opened this issue Mar 5, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Subscription stop misses InteractionInput ? #569

danielpeintner opened this issue Mar 5, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@danielpeintner
Copy link
Contributor

danielpeintner commented Mar 5, 2025

At the moment, the Subscription interface looks like this

Image

It seems the stop() method seems to miss InteractionInput as used elsewhere?

Note: the EventAffordance has cancellation information to be used..

Note2: the problem might arise from the fact that Subscription is used for events and (un)observing properties. The unobserveproperty has no way to indicate cancellation information.

@danielpeintner
Copy link
Contributor Author

See also w3c/wot-thing-description#2085

@relu91
Copy link
Member

relu91 commented May 14, 2025

Call 14/05/2025,

  • To cover the current features of TD, we should have a new function parameter of type InteractionInput
  • @danielpeintner, the problem is that if we want to keep backward compatibility, we should add it as a last parameter, which is inconsistent with the other operations.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants