Skip to content

Update zarr in SPEC 0 #2886

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
dstansby opened this issue Mar 4, 2025 · 6 comments
Closed

Update zarr in SPEC 0 #2886

dstansby opened this issue Mar 4, 2025 · 6 comments

Comments

@dstansby
Copy link
Contributor

dstansby commented Mar 4, 2025

SPEC 0 has a nice chart illustrating when projects should drop scientific python dependencies: https://scientific-python.org/specs/spec-0000/#support-window. This includes zarr, but is out of date - at least it doesn't have v3 in the figure, and I'm guessing some of the dates from v2 might need checking too.

@joshmoore
Copy link
Member

Thanks, @dstansby. Definitely for keeping this aligned with the zarr-python team's intents. We might ask for guidance for the scientific python folks if, e.g., we wanted to shorten the 2.18.x line since the statement has been in the wild for a while.

@jhamman
Copy link
Member

jhamman commented Apr 10, 2025

I posted scientific-python/specs#384 to get some clarity on their update process.

@jhamman
Copy link
Member

jhamman commented Apr 10, 2025

In the issue linked above, it was explained that the page is updated quarterly and is due to be updated this week (or so).

@jhamman jhamman closed this as completed Apr 10, 2025
@dstansby
Copy link
Contributor Author

dstansby commented Apr 10, 2025

scientific-python/specs#385 didn't update the zarr versions listed in the gantt chart, so I don't think this is fixed - e.g., 3.0 isn't on there.

@dstansby dstansby reopened this Apr 10, 2025
@jhamman
Copy link
Member

jhamman commented Apr 14, 2025

The chart was updated in that PR:

Image

In the future, let's open issues related to this topic upstream.

@jhamman jhamman closed this as completed Apr 14, 2025
@dstansby
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ah, I must have had a cached version. Looks good now 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants