-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 793
How to implement my own runtime if I just need a little core kernel ? #1054
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Hi @wenhyan I'd recommend the use of the existing operators in https://github.com/ARM-software/ComputeLibrary/tree/main/src/cpu/operators rather than reimplementing them along with the scheduler. You could certainly implement your own runtime, we have no guides or resources to help with this but you could use the actual library's source code as a reference. For example you can see how
What's the motivation for implementing your own runtime? Are you experiencing any performance issues? Could you please share more details? Hope this helps. |
Hi @morgolock |
Hi @wenhyan We support bare metal builds see https://arm-software.github.io/ComputeLibrary/v23.05/how_to_build.xhtml#S1_5_bare_metal . Compute Library requires support for Can you be more specific about the hardware? Hope this helps. |
Hi @morgolock |
Hi @wenhyan Yes, You can get a toolchain that supports |
Hi,I want to implement my own runtime for maximum performance, Is there some support? thx.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: