Skip to content

Conversation

mhoeger
Copy link
Contributor

@mhoeger mhoeger commented Sep 2, 2020

Adding an alternative to map

resolves Azure/azure-functions-language-worker-protobuf#49

Related to:
Azure/azure-functions-language-worker-protobuf#50
Azure/azure-functions-nodejs-worker#326

Pull request checklist

  • My changes do not require documentation changes
    • Otherwise: Documentation issue linked to PR
  • My changes should not be added to the release notes for the next release
    • Otherwise: I've added my notes to release_notes.md
  • My changes do not need to be backported to a previous version
    • Otherwise: Backport tracked by issue/PR #issue_or_pr
  • I have added all required tests (Unit tests, E2E tests)

Additional information

Additional PR information

@mhoeger mhoeger merged commit 7c81c0d into dev Sep 16, 2020
@mhoeger mhoeger deleted the mhoeger/newProtoHeaders branch September 16, 2020 01:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add alternative for headers and query for RpcHttp that don't rely on "map"
2 participants